Government procurement transparency report 12 prefecture level city transparency zero

Government procurement transparency report: 12 prefecture level cities of the country under the rule of law Transparency Index Research Center zero [Abstract] China Academy of Social Sciences and the Academy of Social Sciences Institute of law of rule of law Chinese project index innovation engineering group Academy of Social Sciences in 2016 released the government procurement transparency report Shaanxi Tongchuan and other 12 cities have zero Chinese transparency Research Academy of Social Sciences National Law Index Research Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Law Center and China law project index innovation engineering group (hereinafter referred to as the project team), today jointly released "transparency in government procurement assessment report (2016)" (hereinafter referred to the "report"). Report disclosure: China’s government procurement information disclosure is still not ideal. The main performance is: the municipal government public poor. Among them, Shaanxi Province, Tongchuan City, Yulin City, Jilin Province, Jilin City, Baishan City Province, Liaoning Fuxin City, Hainan province Danzhou City, Anhui Province, Chizhou City, Jiangxi Yingtan City, Ningxia Yinchuan City, Tibet Lhasa City, Shigatse City, Linzhi city and other 12 cities, the government procurement information transparency index assessment are all zero, at the bottom of the 93 municipal government performance in parallel. In addition, the information disclosure agreement supply model is not ideal. In the three central government procurement agencies transparency survey, the National People’s Congress organ procurement center supply agreement transparency index assessment in zero, bottom of the rankings. Sichuan Guangzhou provinces won the transparency of the first "report" the main author of the CASS Institute of law, Professor Lv Yanbin to the "Legal Daily" reporters, the evaluation and analysis of the 3 central government centralized procurement institutions, the financial department of the 31 provincial government, municipal government and the 93 batch of centralized procurement institutions, they open government procurement the centralized procurement mode, supply agreement procurement mode, complaint handling and punishment result information, transparent investigation and appraisal. The assessment of the time span from January 25, 2016 to March 5, 2016. The assessment, through the assessment of the object of government procurement information release platform to obtain relevant data to the site to publish the relevant project information as a basis for assessing the transparency of their respective government procurement. In order to ensure the accuracy of evaluation results, the project group from April 2016 to August to assess all the object of the evaluation results carried out a detailed review, and retains all the web page screenshots and link records. The evaluation result shows that the central government procurement agencies in the public is better for the central government procurement center; the provincial government in the ranking are: Sichuan Province, Shanghai City, Hunan Province, Tianjin City, Hubei Province, Guizhou Province, Guangdong Province, Heilongjiang Province, Shandong Province, Jiangxi province. The municipal government in the ranking are: Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, Hunan City, the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region province Changsha Liuzhou city of Sichuan Province, Chengdu City, Heilongjiang Province, Qigihar City, Tianjin City, Hongqiao District, the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region City, Shanghai City, Nanning Pudong New Area, Zhejiang city of Zhoushan Province, Fujian city of Xiamen province. Local government procurement information transparency of the worst in January 1, 2003 from the implementation of the government procurement law, the government will clearly open and transparent as the basic system of government procurement相关的主题文章:

« »

Comments closed.